We doubted the 0.95 release would happen this week when you mentioned
it at the Django meet and greet at OSCON. Guess you were right :)
Great work!
Isaac
On 7/29/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We've packaged and released Django version 0.95, which packages all
Hi Dear Members,
FOLLOWING R THE JOBS OF THIS WEEK :
HR Opening Career Centers
SAP FICO Rixyncs
Systems analyst - Siebel Rixyncs
SAP PP Rixyncs
J2ee consultant Rixyncs
SAP APO Rixyncs
Java developers Infra-Tech Consultants
Technical Faculty Infysys Academy
Customer Support S-APPSYS
service
Is it currently possible to create filters in the admin interface that
limit the displayed itemsby a criteria applied to a datefield?
As an example, if a user model has datefields to indicate start and end
dates of their site membership, I'd like to create a filter to only
show 'current
Hi, carlos
I just come across the same problem with ifequal and bring into the same
solution with yours that I think is silly too.
I just want to convert the auto-generated id into string to have a simple
correct ifequal test. I simply can not convert strings into integer
because strings
Is there any way to make the following any simpler? It's inside
another {% for ... %}, so the ugliness is particularly jarring.
{% for t in s.teachers %}
{{ t.userinfo.informal_name }}{% if not forloop.last %}}; {{% endif %}}
{% endfor %}
It's roughly the equivalent of
{{ s.teachers|join:";
My first task with Django now that I've got it set up on on dreamhost
account and have gone throught the tutorial is to take one my my basic
HTML sites and transfer it into Django templates.
All my templates look good, written the urlconf, my views, and got all
my images and css into my media
Hi all,
We've packaged and released Django version 0.95, which packages all of
the significant advances in Django development since the 0.91 release
in January 2006.
For more information see these two documents:
http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2006/jul/29/095/
On 07/28/06 19:20, Nagy Károly wrote:
> Steven Armstrong írta:
>
>>I've extended some of django's built in model and form fields to accept
>>an additional kwarg named 'html_attributes'.
>>
>>It works like this:
>>
>>class Whatever(models.Model):
>> ...
>> title =
On 7/29/06, Javier Nievas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There's a course in the University of Granada (Spain) about Django and
> Web 2.0. That's the link with more info about it.
>
>
On 7/29/06, Gennan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will like to django's ORM in my standalone app (not web app). Do I always
> its admin tool to create tables? Or it can reuse the table structure I
> create in the db?
You should be able to use the Django ORM on an existing database (not
On 7/29/06, Javier Nievas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Django does not use MVC model, it uses Model - View - Template (MVT)
> model. It's similar, because an MVC view is like an MVT template, and
> an MVC controller is like a MVT view.
Hello all,
I'll illustrate my problem with a small example.
Let's consider a data model:
--
from django.db import models
class OldTag(models.Model):
content = models.TextField()
class NewTag(models.Model):
content =
On 7/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm evaluating the possibility to use Django for a project, but I have
> read so many comments about Django vs TurboGears and right now I am
> very confused.
> I installed both of them in my system and sincerelly I found that
> Django is
Hi!I will like to django's ORM in my standalone app (not web app). Do I always its admin tool to create tables? Or it can reuse the table structure I create in the db? Gen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi all,
I'm evaluating the possibility to use Django for a project, but I have
read so many comments about Django vs TurboGears and right now I am
very confused.
I installed both of them in my system and sincerelly I found that
Django is very easy to install and getting started while TG is not
Sorry for the bump. But I'm genuinly interested in understanding why
it's not possible to write:
>>> album.song_set.get_or_create(name='name', album=album)
without specifying the album explicitly as a kw argument. Shouldn't the
album parameter in this example be inferred through the
while you're at it
:)
On 29/07/06, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/28/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 28, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Jay Parlar wrote:
> > > Not that I mind :)
> >
> > http://code.djangoproject.com/changeset/3477
> >
> >
> >
>
> Ha,
Malcolm Tredinnick írta:
>This is the sort of thing that maybe starts crossing the line between
>representation and presentation a bit too much. You are putting a lot of
>presentation information into the data model description and they
>should, as much as possible be separate. That is why I
18 matches
Mail list logo
