Op 13-jul-2011, om 08:25 heeft Jirka Vejrazka het volgende geschreven:
>> Thank you all for your help!!!
>
> I know I'm a bit late to the party (blame timezones :), but thought
> I'd put my 2 cents worth in :)
>
> For inspecting models from command lines (usually when working with
> models from
I like to add:
import pdb; pdb.set_trace();
To my code.
Reload the page.
Go to the development server instance. You'll see that the page hangs forever
,since we started the python debugger.
Now you can easily inspect all variables, classes and functions from PDB.
Of course you're not limited
Did you write your own view for that purpose ?!
In that view you could use render_to_response and pass you own template
to that.
Von: django-users@googlegroups.com
[mailto:django-users@googlegroups.com] Im Auftrag von Joshua Russo
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2011 04:24
An: django-users@google
Op 12-jul-2011, om 09:18 heeft bruno desthuilliers het volgende geschreven:
> On Jul 12, 4:32 am, garagefan wrote:
>> simply put, here's my code
>>
>> class ContentBlock(Orderable, Displayable):
>> location = models.ManyToManyField(ContentBlockLocation, blank=True,
>> null=True, help_text="li
> Thank you all for your help!!!
I know I'm a bit late to the party (blame timezones :), but thought
I'd put my 2 cents worth in :)
For inspecting models from command lines (usually when working with
models from legacy databases) I often use model_to_dict which is
"hidden" in django.forms.models.
Can you paste the following database settings from your settings.py? Is it
something like this...
DATABASES = {
'default': {
'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.sqlite3',
'NAME': 'dbDev.db',
'USER': '', # Not used with sqlite3.
'PASSWORD': '',
I'm using python manage.py runserver, and I have restarted it dozens
of times.
On Jul 12, 8:58 pm, Micky Hulse wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Brent wrote:
> > Unfortunately, no matter what kind of path I put for
> > AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE, the same error appears.
>
> I don't know your se
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Brent wrote:
> Unfortunately, no matter what kind of path I put for
> AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE, the same error appears.
I don't know your setup, but have your tried restating Apache? That's
probably a stupid question/suggestion, but maybe worth a shot?
--
You receive
Unfortunately, no matter what kind of path I put for
AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE, the same error appears.
On Jul 12, 5:51 pm, Andre Terra wrote:
> As the traceback helpfully states,
>
> Exception Type: SiteProfileNotAvailable at /profile/Exception Value:
> Unable to load the profile model, check AUTH_PRO
Here is the solution:
def get_template_names(self):
next_step = int(self.steps.current)
return 'step_%s.html' % next_step
Simple solution. What is confusing is that the documentation says that
get_template_names() should return a list.
--
You received this message because y
I want to use my own logout template but it doesn't want to pick it up. The
login template worked just fine, but for anything that's already in the
admin's template/registration folder, it only wants to use those. I tried
putting my templates folder before the admin templates folder in the list
hi,
I am sorry. My English is very bad.
Yes, i want to make persistent databases connection on each session.
and yesterday i try to modify the code on
"site-packages\django\db\__init__.py"
def close_connection(**kw
I would guess your quickest way forward is to change backends, as it
appears that this is a larger issue with database transactions between
threads, which is a couple of years old.
I've been tinkering with LocalMemCache for a really small site, and
django-redis-cache as a toy, I know that some hav
Also try different ports and opening the server for external IPs to make
sure this isn't a network issue
C:\>manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:11010
and then http://localhost:11010
Cheers,
André Terra
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Issac Kelly wrote:
> A few things to check:
>
> Is runserver
A few things to check:
Is runserver (python manage.py runserver) running? does it crash when
you try to submit your form?
Have you done a syncdb successfully? If so, then django can connect to
your database, and that's probably not the problem.
I would guess it's something in your view (or maybe
I'm pretty new to Django and web development in general so the answer
to this question may be rather obvious. I've created a ModelForm in
Django so that the data submitted by a user is saved in a database.
When the user submits the form, I believe the data validates but it
can't connect to the data
As the traceback helpfully states,
Exception Type: SiteProfileNotAvailable at /profile/Exception Value:
Unable to load the profile model, check AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE in your
project settings
http://www.google.com/search?&q=django+Unable+to+load+the+profile+model%2C+check+AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE+in+your
Thank you all for your help!!!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
Good idea. Unfortunately, I tried that, but it results in a
SiteProfileNotAvailable error:
http://dpaste.com/567421/
On Jul 12, 3:15 pm, Andre Terra wrote:
> Instead of using get or create, why not setting up a post_save signal
> for the User model so that users always have a profile associated
Hi Guys,
we are looking for a Django Developer in the Region of Vienna, Austria.
Starting with the end of August 2011, we need a freelancer Django/Python
Developer for an international Company, in Vienna/Austria.
The work will be on-site at the customers place, about 40 hours a week.
We will pay
Instead of using get or create, why not setting up a post_save signal
for the User model so that users always have a profile associated with
them?
Cheers,
Andre
On 7/12/11, Brent wrote:
> Thanks for the help guys.
>
> Micky, that tutorial looks very good. I think I almost have it
> working. Just
Running syncdb again didn't seem to fix it. I tried deleting the
database entirely, and starting from a new database, but that also
didn't work.
On Jul 12, 2:28 pm, Shawn Milochik wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Brent wrote:
> > Thanks for the help guys.
>
> > Micky, that tutorial look
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Brent wrote:
> Thanks for the help guys.
>
> Micky, that tutorial looks very good. I think I almost have it
> working. Just one more error:
>
> http://dpaste.com/567361/
>
Looks like maybe you didn't run syncdb after adding something to INSTALLED_APPS.
--
You r
Thanks for the help guys.
Micky, that tutorial looks very good. I think I almost have it
working. Just one more error:
http://dpaste.com/567361/
Andre, thanks for mentioning Pinax. I'll give it a shot if this
doesn't work out. I have a year of python experience, but I haven't
written anything we
You should actually use dir() or vars() rather than __dict__.
Here's a thorough explanation, along with an example serializer which might
need to access an object's attributes:
http://blog.enterthefoo.com/2008/08/pythons-vars.html
Regards,
André Terra
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Marc Aym
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Lukich wrote:
> Hi. I have just started diving into Django and this question came up
> - is there a way for me to examine all the attribute values of an
> object? In Rails there's such a thing as debug statement which spits
> out all the details about the object.
This tutorial helped me:
http://www.turnkeylinux.org/blog/django-profile
Note: The above tutorial uses an FK to User model... The Django docs
suggest a OneToOne field.
Hope that helps.
Micky
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To
Useful, if the code is well documented:
http://www.java2s.com/Code/Python/Utility/CheapandsimpleAPIhelper.htm
IIRC, use it like:
from apihelper import info
info(object, spacing=20)
Cheers,
André
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
cal.leem...@simplicitymedial
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Brent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know of a simple, working example of custom user profile
> fields?
>
> I want to have a custom field, say, "favorite color," which is unique
> to each user. Then I want users to be able to login, and be taken to a
> page called "
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/topics/auth/#storing-additional-information-about-users
Everything you should need is in here. Once you have something started I
can probably help out if you have any specific questions.
Also, as long as you have a one-to-one field there's really no need to
Hi,
Does anyone know of a simple, working example of custom user profile
fields?
I want to have a custom field, say, "favorite color," which is unique
to each user. Then I want users to be able to login, and be taken to a
page called "profile" that displays that custom field.
So far, I have logg
In fact, if anyone wants to extend on this concept, I'd be more than happy
to provide some assistance :)
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Lukich wrote:
>
>> Hi. I have just s
Of course :) I'll make sure to take a high quality recording and stick it on
YT.
Cal
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
> Can you please ..please...please..please record this session!?
>
> -V
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Lukich wrote:
> Hi. I have just started diving into Django and this question came up
> - is there a way for me to examine all the attribute values of an
> object? In Rails there's such a thing as debug statement which spits
> out all the details about the object
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Lukich wrote:
> Hi. I have just started diving into Django and this question came up
> - is there a way for me to examine all the attribute values of an
> object? In Rails there's such a thing as debug statement which spits
> out all the details about the object
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Andre Terra wrote:
>
>> May I ask if you are managing to do this (and, if so, how) without
>>> writing duplicate logic?
>>>
>>
>> This, to me, is a key area for improvement. Aside from the development
>>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Lukich wrote:
> Hi. I have just started diving into Django and this question came up
> - is there a way for me to examine all the attribute values of an
> object? In Rails there's such a thing as debug statement which spits
> out all the details about the objec
Can you please ..please...please..please record this session!?
-V
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+un
Hi. I have just started diving into Django and this question came up
- is there a way for me to examine all the attribute values of an
object? In Rails there's such a thing as debug statement which spits
out all the details about the object. From what I have seen so far in
Django, I can either d
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Andre Terra wrote:
> May I ask if you are managing to do this (and, if so, how) without
>> writing duplicate logic?
>>
>
> This, to me, is a key area for improvement. Aside from the development
> challenge the idea imposes, an extra issue with writing DRY validati
Some interesting thoughts here. I once attempted to make a merge between
Django validation and jQuery validation (spent several weeks on it), but my
approach wasn't dynamic enough, and ended up not being used again.
Personally, I'd like to see some sort of standardized JS library which
works seaml
I ran into this problem using django core's database cache:
ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "cache_pkey"
STATEMENT: INSERT INTO "cache" (cache_key, value, expires) VALUES (E':
1:cms-menu_nodes_en-us_1', E'gAJdcQEoY21lbnVzLmJhc2UKTmF2aW
LOG: server process (PID 8453) was te
>
> May I ask if you are managing to do this (and, if so, how) without
> writing duplicate logic?
>
This, to me, is a key area for improvement. Aside from the development
challenge the idea imposes, an extra issue with writing DRY validation for
django and javascript is that the project doesn't of
Have you looked at haystack?
http://haystacksearch.org/
Cheers,
André
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Michel30 wrote:
> I have tried and I think I have it mostly working: it returns ALL
> unique docid's.
>
> What is left is that my code is part of a search function. Originally
> I got norma
On Jul 12, 3:49 pm, Michel30 wrote:
> I have tried and I think I have it mostly working: it returns ALL
> unique docid's.
>
> What is left is that my code is part of a search function. Originally
> I got normalized keywords from a user and used those Q-objects to look
> for keywords in a selected
On Jul 12, 10:15 am, Venkatraman S wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
>
>
> cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
> > On 12 Jul 2011 08:13, "bruno desthuilliers"
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 12, 3:37 am, Venkatraman S wrote:
>
> > > > On the valid
I have tried and I think I have it mostly working: it returns ALL
unique docid's.
What is left is that my code is part of a search function. Originally
I got normalized keywords from a user and used those Q-objects to look
for keywords in a selected set of columns.
I still have to figure out how
Hi all,
Great response to this, 45 registered votes in total.
The webcast will take place on Monday 29th August 2011 - (Minimum resolution
1920x1080)
However, because the time zone results are almost split 50/50, I'm going to
allow users to select from two time slots, if the results are still sp
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:25 PM, bruno desthuilliers
wrote:
> On Jul 12, 3:07 pm, Tom Evans wrote:
> (snip)
>> Programming by permutation is never a good strategy.
>
> Indeed. Yet:
>
>> A typical view using RequestContext and render_to_response should look
>> like this:
>>
>> def someview(request
On Jul 12, 12:26 pm, Michel30 wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've been trying your suggestions but I'm afraid I'm stretching the
> limits of my Python/Django abilities ;-)
>
> Bruno got it right: what I want is a queryset of "model" with distinct
> docid having the highest version number, sorted by revisio
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:41 PM, nicolas HERSOG wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>> It's very strange, i just found a way to solve my probleme but i don't have
>> 'django.core.context_processors.request' in my TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS.
>>
>> For solve my pr
On Jul 12, 3:07 pm, Tom Evans wrote:
(snip)
> Programming by permutation is never a good strategy.
Indeed. Yet:
> A typical view using RequestContext and render_to_response should look
> like this:
>
> def someview(request):
> ctxt = RequestContext({
> 'hello': 'world',
> })
> return r
Thx !
I'll read this and try to implement the "right way" :)
thx Tom
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:41 PM, nicolas HERSOG
> wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> > It's very strange, i just found a way to solve my probleme but i don't
> have
> > 'django.core.con
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:41 PM, nicolas HERSOG wrote:
> Hi !
>
> It's very strange, i just found a way to solve my probleme but i don't have
> 'django.core.context_processors.request' in my TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS.
>
> For solve my problem i added in my views.py :
> from django.shortcuts impo
Hi !
It's very strange, i just found a way to solve my probleme but i don't have
'django.core.context_processors.request' in my TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS.
For solve my problem i added in my views.py :
from django.shortcuts import render_to_response
this is my previous index views who didn t wo
yes Bruno, that's what i mean, so this is doable.. and also can prevent DDOS
attack to your core web server...
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:28 PM, bruno desthuilliers <
bruno.desthuilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 12, 11:57 am, Phang Mulianto wrote:
> > hi..
> >
> > why not block the spiders in t
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Gelonida N wrote:
>
> I'd like to implement a simple django address book Application with over
> 1000 entries.
>
> I'm still struggling whether (and if yes how) to use Ajax or not
> for searching a contact.
>
> Ideally I would start filtering the entries while typ
Hi,
I'd like to implement a simple django address book Application with over
1000 entries.
I'm still struggling whether (and if yes how) to use Ajax or not
for searching a contact.
Ideally I would start filtering the entries while typing a name in the
search field)
I'd like to use the applica
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 23:31 -0700, Suprnaturall wrote:
> The problem is : when i m in login.html i see my user.username, but
> when i submit the login form and being redirect to index i don t
> retrieve the user.username.
do you have this in your settings.py:
TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS = (
On Jul 12, 11:57 am, Phang Mulianto wrote:
> hi..
>
> why not block the spiders in the web server environtment .
> i think it is better than has to put the code in the apps.
>
> is it possible ? because i had read that some web server can block
> unnecesary request before reach the real web server
Hi guys,
I've been trying your suggestions but I'm afraid I'm stretching the
limits of my Python/Django abilities ;-)
Bruno got it right: what I want is a queryset of "model" with distinct
docid having the highest version number, sorted by revisiondate.
If have the following result of my
found_e
Hi guys,
I've been trying your suggestions but I'm afraid I'm stretching the
limits of my Python/Django abilities ;-)
Bruno got it right: what I want is a queryset of "model" with distinct
docid having the highest version number, sorted by revisiondate.
If have the following result of my
found_e
Hi guys,
I've been trying your suggestions but I'm afraid I'm stretching the
limits of my Python/Django abilities ;-)
Bruno got it right: what I want is a queryset of "model" with distinct
docid having the highest version number, sorted by revisiondate.
If have the following result of my
found_e
Hi,
First of all, apologize me for my poor, poor english.
I m new with django and i m stuck with a odd thing.
I created a login form and use the default django login handlet like
this :
base.html :
(...) {% if user.is_authenticated %}
{{user.use
Hi,
This will be my first year at DjangoCon and I wanted to know regarding
activities that happen during sprints.
Thanks and Regards,
Shubhanan Bakre
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-us
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 08:42 +0100, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
wrote:
> Oh, that's a good idea. I can probably do a write up about CodeIgniter
> and
> PHP. Also, perhaps this deserves a wiki page of its own..?
let's see how it goes - if it gets big enough we can separate it.
--
regards
K
hi..
why not block the spiders in the web server environtment .
i think it is better than has to put the code in the apps.
is it possible ? because i had read that some web server can block
unnecesary request before reach the real web server..like nginx, lighttpd,
etc..
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at
On 2011-07-12, at 07:04 , Venkatraman S wrote:
> Comments? (note that i am not passing request object to individual doPOST or
> doGET).
You can trivially do that by using callable objects as views, with a common
superclass for dispatching.
class MethodView(object):
def __call__(self, request,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I really love django's documentation. It covers a lot of ground and is really
> well written.
> I do have one problem with it. It might be best explained with an example.
>
> I want to see all methods and properties of the reque
> Hi all,
>
> has someone an effective way to block away bots and spiders?
> There are so many ignoring robots.txt - besides facebook and tons of
> Java/xyz clients there are many more illegal spiders around.
>
> So does anyone have a performance effective way to block them out?
> Or do you thi
On 12.07.2011 11:23, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I really love django's documentation. It covers a lot of ground and is really
> well written.
> I do have one problem with it. It might be best explained with an example.
>
> I want to see all methods and properties of the request parame
Op 12-jul-2011, om 07:04 heeft Venkatraman S het volgende geschreven:
> We have to check for request.method to suitably route the request to the
> logic.
>
> Would it be nice if we have something like doGet or doPost(similar to java
> servlets) that we have in our views,
> so that the request
Hello,
I really love django's documentation. It covers a lot of ground and is really
well written.
I do have one problem with it. It might be best explained with an example.
I want to see all methods and properties of the request parameter in the view.
Search the docs for "request" doesn't hel
"""
On Jul 10, 5:34 pm, "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]"
wrote:
Sadly, with all the extra projects I'm working on atm, it would just
sit in
my todo list for at least 3-6 months :(
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
wrote:
[If you want to add search to the community aggrega
> > As the form is quite long I don't want to maintain a
> > field-after-field html template for the results.
>
> > Is there any convenient way to do this?
>
> > Iterate over the fields in the form in an email template and send that
> > template over?
>
> Hmm, yes, that'll do. I was hop
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:32 AM, garagefan wrote:
> simply put, here's my code
>
> class ContentBlock(Orderable, Displayable):
> location = models.ManyToManyField(ContentBlockLocation, blank=True,
> null=True, help_text="list of locations to display content block")
> page = models.ManyToManyFiel
On Jul 9, 9:41 am, sandeep kaur wrote:
> I want to make some of my data in django-templates, variable. And
> separate single file to define the variables. How can I do this?
This is a common occurrence for Django - start with the overview here:
http://www.djangobook.com/en/2.0/chapter04/
--
You
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
> On 12 Jul 2011 08:13, "bruno desthuilliers"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 12, 3:37 am, Venkatraman S wrote:
> > >
> > > On the validation, yes, it is a little pesky. But, offlate, i am
Hi all,
has someone an effective way to block away bots and spiders?
There are so many ignoring robots.txt - besides facebook and tons of
Java/xyz clients there are many more illegal spiders around.
So does anyone have a performance effective way to block them out?
Or do you think - if performanc
On 12 Jul 2011 08:13, "bruno desthuilliers"
wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 3:37 am, Venkatraman S wrote:
> >
> > On the validation, yes, it is a little pesky. But, offlate, i am trying
to
> > *understand* it better and trying to move the logic
> > to the client. For eg. jquery-validate does bulk of the st
Oh, that's a good idea. I can probably do a write up about CodeIgniter and
PHP. Also, perhaps this deserves a wiki page of its own..?
On 12 Jul 2011 04:08, "Kenneth Gonsalves" wrote:
> hi,
>
> I think this deserves a thread of it's own. I have started a section on
> migrating from other frameworks
On Jul 12, 4:32 am, garagefan wrote:
> simply put, here's my code
>
> class ContentBlock(Orderable, Displayable):
> location = models.ManyToManyField(ContentBlockLocation, blank=True,
> null=True, help_text="list of locations to display content block")
> page = models.ManyToManyField(Page, bla
On Jul 12, 3:37 am, Venkatraman S wrote:
>
> On the validation, yes, it is a little pesky. But, offlate, i am trying to
> *understand* it better and trying to move the logic
> to the client. For eg. jquery-validate does bulk of the stuff on client side
> - atleast for required fields. So, moving
>
On Jul 12, 7:04 am, Venkatraman S wrote:
> We have to check for request.method to suitably route the request to the
> logic.
>
> Would it be nice if we have something like doGet or doPost(similar to java
> servlets) that we have in our views,
> so that the request gets automatically routed , and t
84 matches
Mail list logo
