Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-20 Thread Jay Parlar
On 10/20/06, Ramdas S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do I integrate the per-object-permissions trunk to my regular django > trunk which powers the web site. > > I checked the per-object-permissions trunk it works properly at least as far > as my simple cms apps are concerned. > You'll have to d

Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-20 Thread Ramdas S
How do I integrate the per-object-permissions trunk to my regular django trunk which powers the web site.I checked the per-object-permissions trunk it works properly at least as far as my simple cms apps are concerned. Ramdas On 10/20/06, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since I saw my name (i

Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-20 Thread Jay Parlar
Since I saw my name (incorrectly spelled) show up in this thread, I'll throw my 2 cents in (That's CDN, now almost worth 2 cents US!) I'm using Chris Long's branch on a production site right now. It's nothing major, a volunteer organization with minimal needs, but for my limited uses, it is worki

Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-19 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
Hi Nick, On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 18:48 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Malcolm , > Thanks for you for your contributions, your presence on this project > really makes a positive difference. > > > It's already "ready" and able to be used. Chris keeps his branch in sync > > with trunk regularly

Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Malcolm , Thanks for you for your contributions, your presence on this project really makes a positive difference. > It's already "ready" and able to be used. Chris keeps his branch in sync > with trunk regularly and is extremely responsive to fixing bugs. It will > be merged when we have had a

Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> here is what I hear you saying. > > you'd rather write your own code to do the same/similar thing to what > chris > has already done (and also what has a high chance of getting merged > in the > coming months). What I'm trying to say, is that I was working to implement something that wouldn't i

Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-19 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 16:40 -0700, Noah wrote: > This sort of thing is asked for time and time again, is there any idea > when Chris' code will be ready? It's already "ready" and able to be used. Chris keeps his branch in sync with trunk regularly and is extremely responsive to fixing bugs. It wi

Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-19 Thread Noah
This sort of thing is asked for time and time again, is there any idea when Chris' code will be ready? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to djang

Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-19 Thread Ian Holsman
On 20/10/2006, at 9:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Ian, > This is very similar to what Chris has done. The issue is that his > code hasn't been merged with Trunk, which puts me in an awkward > position in terms of adopting it for something that is outside the > scope of a test applica

Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ian, This is very similar to what Chris has done. The issue is that his code hasn't been merged with Trunk, which puts me in an awkward position in terms of adopting it for something that is outside the scope of a test application. I started working on a solution to this problem a few month

Re: (Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-19 Thread Ian Holsman
Hi Nick. can you tell me how this is different that the stuff Chris Long worked on in his branch? It seems very similar. regards Ian. On 20/10/2006, at 6:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Note: I have tried to post this two other time, but the thread wasn't > added to the group. I apologi

(Third Attempt To Post)Complex Application Security Model

2006-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: I have tried to post this two other time, but the thread wasn't added to the group. I apologize if this shows up multiple times on the list. I just want to make sure that it's being sent out. --