On May 18, 12:55 pm, "Brett Hoerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But if you aren't clustering, say you have only a single server, is
> > there an advantage?
>
> Yes, locmem is memory local to a single Python process. If
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But if you aren't clustering, say you have only a single server, is
> there an advantage?
Yes, locmem is memory local to a single Python process. If you're
running Django in some sort of multi-process server (as most people
do)
On May 17, 7:37 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I managed to get memcached up and running in about 5 minutes, so
> whilst it does involve more setup than locmem I wouldn't say it's
> difficult to the point of not being worth doing.
Thanks for that. I'll likely give it a try.
I managed to get memcached up and running in about 5 minutes, so
whilst it does involve more setup than locmem I wouldn't say it's
difficult to the point of not being worth doing.
Memcached is basically more efficient in general and supports
clustering which makes it much better for scalability
Can someone run down the differences between using Memcached vs
locmem?
The docs indicate Memcached is "the best" solution, but seems
considerably harder to setup. Just curious what the trade-offs are.
Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
5 matches
Mail list logo
