Op vr, 21-07-2006 te 05:58 +0300, schreef Elver Loho:
> SciTE for my code, though, which is pretty much just glorified Notepad
> with syntax hightlighting :P
That's what it looks like at first sight; when you look deeper, it's
more like an alternative to vim or emacs, except it doesn't run in a
Thanks everyone for your input. So far I'm really pleased with what I
see. I'm gonna take Django for a test drive on a website project I'm
about to start now and see how it goes -- but I do get the feeling
I'm falling in love :-)
The one thing I think I may miss about Rails most is Ruby. Py
Elver Loho wrote:
> In CherryPy, every "directory" of the website is mapped to a class
> with its exposed methods being the "files" in that directory. It's a
> godsend as you can write any kind of functionality (shopping cart,
> blog, whatnot) into a class or two and plop it anywhere else. Very
>
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:56:14 -0500
Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> > What's the digg link out of curiousity?
>
> http://digg.com/offbeat_news/Dog_eats_Nintendo..._DS_Lite%3B_Oh%
> 2C_and_NIntendo_s_Customer_Service_rocks.
>
On Jul 21, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> What's the digg link out of curiousity?
http://digg.com/offbeat_news/Dog_eats_Nintendo..._DS_Lite%3B_Oh%
2C_and_NIntendo_s_Customer_Service_rocks.
Wow, almost 1200 diggs now... schweet.
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~-
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:14:39 -0500
Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * My personal server just got Dugg and handled it without
> hiccupping. The box cost me around $3k, has 8GB of RAM and dual
> Opteron processors; load peaked around 0.7.
What's the digg link out of curiousity?
On 21-Jul-06, at 7:44 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>>> How about memory footprint? Can I run 100+
>>> Django sites on a shared server and expect smooth sailing?
>
> Well, it certainly depends on the server, of course -- you obviously
> get what you pay for.
>
> The memory consumption for a singl
On Jul 20, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Sean Schertell wrote:
>> How about memory footprint? Can I run 100+
>> Django sites on a shared server and expect smooth sailing?
Well, it certainly depends on the server, of course -- you obviously
get what you pay for.
The memory consumption for a single mod_pyth
On 7/21/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for presenting a different angle. I imagine you're one of
> these long-bearded guys who uses NetBSD and Fluxbox as his main
> desktop OS and edits code in VI through a tsch shell ;-)
Ubuntu Dapper and Gnome. (I need Unix on commodi
Thanks so much for your reply Adrian! Can you also please comment a
bit on how well Django works in a shared environment?
> How about memory footprint? Can I run 100+
> Django sites on a shared server and expect smooth sailing?
Thanks!
Sean
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~-
Thanks for presenting a different angle. I imagine you're one of
these long-bearded guys who uses NetBSD and Fluxbox as his main
desktop OS and edits code in VI through a tsch shell ;-)
For me? OS X and TextMate plus some well thought-out framework that
allows me to get from A to Z in __as
On 7/20/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/20/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (1) Portable apps across projects architecture. From what I've read,
> > it sounds like a perfect fit for what I want to do. Is it really that
> > great?
>
> Yes. It is that great.
On 21-Jul-06, at 6:56 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:
>> It's exactly what you're looking for, in that respect. And thanks for
>> indirectly encouraging us to advertise this feature more...
>
> It's the main reason I chose to develop my first app in Django,
> instead of Rails, and from then I've been h
Allow me to offer a dissenting view. I recently faced the task of
finding a Python-based framework to use at work and tried several,
including Django. I finally settled on using CherryPy with Kid. (Which
is what TurboGears is doing, but with a lot of extra cruft thrown in.
And btw, the TurboGears
+1 on the portability of apps. We're doing something very similar for
our client projects.
Since moving to Django we have:
- increased our cash flow by being able to hammer out more
"small-ish" projects in a shorter amount time
- decreased our dev time -- we're finding ourselves waiting on
cl
On 21/07/2006, at 11:22 AM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:(1) Portable apps across projects architecture. From what I've read, it sounds like a perfect fit for what I want to do. Is it really that great? Yes. It is that great. :) It's really interesting that you see that as one of Django's main strengths,
On 7/20/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (1) Portable apps across projects architecture. From what I've read,
> it sounds like a perfect fit for what I want to do. Is it really that
> great?
Yes. It is that great. :) It's really interesting that you see that as
one of Django's main
Greetings Djangoers,
I'm thinking of defecting from the Ruby on Rails camp because I think
Django may be more in line with what I want to do. If you have a
couple minutes, could you please tell me if I'm on the right track?
What I want to do
===
Basically, I want to
18 matches
Mail list logo
