Re: Model Basics

2006-02-28 Thread Max Battcher
On 2/28/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, we talked about this on Sunday at the Django sprint. The > tentative plan is to introduce a CurrentUserField which is > special-cased in the admin logic. How would this be handled in user code? How would Manipulators deal with

Re: Model Basics

2006-02-28 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 2/28/06, DaveW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see that ticket #1268 has been closed as WontFix - threadlocal is > felt to be to heavyweight a solution. Unfortunately, some mechanism for > this is going to be needed for Django to be used in many corporate > environments - has anyone had any

Re: Model Basics

2006-02-28 Thread DaveW
I see that ticket #1268 has been closed as WontFix - threadlocal is felt to be to heavyweight a solution. Unfortunately, some mechanism for this is going to be needed for Django to be used in many corporate environments - has anyone had any other thoughts about how to implement this?

Re: Model Basics

2006-02-15 Thread ChaosKCW
Thanks, I wasnt sure from the documentation if subclassing would do a "inheritance" DB thing like many ORM tools support, or simply combine the two classes as I was hoping for.

Re: more model basics - mny to many's

2006-02-14 Thread gizo
ah, looks clever, i like that. I'll check it when i get into work. thanks...

Re: more model basics - mny to many's

2006-02-14 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Feb 14, 2006, at 9:55 AM, gizo wrote: Each Song can have Many Player/Instrument combinations (where each musician could play any instrument, in theory) Give this a shot:: class Musician(meta.Model): ... class Instrument(meta.Model): ...

Re: more model basics - mny to many's

2006-02-14 Thread gizo
wont that just give me: Each Song can have many Instruemtns Each Song can have many Musicians? what I want is: Each Song can have Many Player/Instrument combinations (where each musician could play any instrument, in theory)

Re: more model basics - mny to many's

2006-02-14 Thread patrick k
what do you need the table songInstrument for? i´d suggest using a many-to-many relationship ... see http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model_api/#many-to-many-relations hips class song(meta.Model): title = ... duration = ... instrument = meta.ManyToManyField(instrument) musician =

more model basics - mny to many's

2006-02-13 Thread gizo
Hiya. I am not a web developer, okay, just trying to do a band website (so take it easy on me, please ;) I am having trouble with my models. I have the following: class musician(meta.Model): ... class instrument(meta.Model): ... class song(meta.Model): .. class

Re: Model Basics

2006-02-13 Thread Brice Carpentier
2006/2/12, ChaosKCW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 1) can you access the session user object from the model _pre_save no see http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1268 though > 2) can you subclass a model. yes see the docs (either on www.djangoproject.com/documentation or the wiki on

Re: Model Basics

2006-02-12 Thread ChaosKCW
PS the project and app level DB would also allow for creater scalablity and better seperation of concerns. One last question, is it possible to add a glboal hook into the ORM layer ala SOX requiremens i the USA. To proide an audit of any transaction ?

Model Basics

2006-02-12 Thread ChaosKCW
Hi I would like to ask about three things: 1) can you access the session user object from the model _pre_save 2) can you subclass a model. 3) app level db Example of what I want: class Audited_Model(meta.Model): audit_created = meta.DateTimeField('Date and Time this account was