On Mar 19, 11:00 am, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
> Your project is really funny, but you will need to fight with two factors:
>
> few users/developers understand non-blocking/async programming (albeit a lot
> of them use, and blindly suggest, such technologies)
>
> webservers support for multipexing
Sorry, I didn't mean to sound like I was putting down your application. I
think it's a great thing to develop more applications. I can't wait to see
the progress you make :)
I was just trying to clarify that these days, stock Nginx does provide WSGI
in its default configuration. Of course, I didn'
On 03/19/2012 08:28 PM, Alexander wrote:
Hi Bolang,
I'm not sure what you meant by "simply using nginx" since as far as I
know it doesn't have standard WSGI module. I hope you're not talking
about running WSGI application as CGI script, do you?
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for your long response, real
I think it is an interesting project, many may say its pointless given
the "wealth" of wsgi servers, but I think there is always space to
explore more, who says this project can't be faster than many of
today's servers?, or who says there wont be anything useful out of
this project even if is not r
Il giorno 19/mar/2012, alle ore 15:46, Alexander ha scritto:
> Kurtis,
>
> There is nothing wrong with using uwsgi protocol instead of FastCGI
> but you still have to run uWSGI server and it doesn't fit "simply
> using nginx" description. And I wouldn't call it "out of the box"
> either if I'd h
Kurtis,
There is nothing wrong with using uwsgi protocol instead of FastCGI
but you still have to run uWSGI server and it doesn't fit "simply
using nginx" description. And I wouldn't call it "out of the box"
either if I'd have to rebuild Nginx instead of using one shipped with
my Linux distro (Deb
>
> I'm not sure what you meant by "simply using nginx" since as far as I
> know it doesn't have standard WSGI module.
I use Nginx w/ WSGI (Django running under uWSGI, communicating w/ WSGI
Protocol) out of the box. No special modules or anything were installed --
just a quick download and compil
Hi Bolang,
I'm not sure what you meant by "simply using nginx" since as far as I
know it doesn't have standard WSGI module. I hope you're not talking
about running WSGI application as CGI script, do you?
As to comparing Gunicorn to gevent-fastcgi Gunocorn is HTTP server and
gevent-fastcg is FastC
I feel the need to inject, once again, that the Twisted WSGI container
rocks.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Bolang wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
> What is the advantage of using gevent-fastcgi instead of simply using
> nginx and maybe with gunicorn?
>
>
>
> On 03/18/2012 12:59 PM, Alexander wrote:
Hi Alexander,
What is the advantage of using gevent-fastcgi instead of simply using
nginx and maybe with gunicorn?
On 03/18/2012 12:59 PM, Alexander wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm working on gevent coroutine based library FastCGI server
implementation and I's ready for testing. It most likely
Hello everybody,
I'm working on gevent coroutine based library FastCGI server
implementation and I's ready for testing. It most likely contains lots
of bugs and it would be great if you help to catch some of them.
Just install gevent-fastcgi package:
$ easy_install gevent-fastcgi
Then include
11 matches
Mail list logo
