Have you looked at haystack?
http://haystacksearch.org/
Cheers,
André
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Michel30 wrote:
> I have tried and I think I have it mostly working: it returns ALL
> unique docid's.
>
> What is left is that my code is part of a search function. Originally
> I got norma
On Jul 12, 3:49 pm, Michel30 wrote:
> I have tried and I think I have it mostly working: it returns ALL
> unique docid's.
>
> What is left is that my code is part of a search function. Originally
> I got normalized keywords from a user and used those Q-objects to look
> for keywords in a selected
I have tried and I think I have it mostly working: it returns ALL
unique docid's.
What is left is that my code is part of a search function. Originally
I got normalized keywords from a user and used those Q-objects to look
for keywords in a selected set of columns.
I still have to figure out how
On Jul 12, 12:26 pm, Michel30 wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've been trying your suggestions but I'm afraid I'm stretching the
> limits of my Python/Django abilities ;-)
>
> Bruno got it right: what I want is a queryset of "model" with distinct
> docid having the highest version number, sorted by revisio
Hi guys,
I've been trying your suggestions but I'm afraid I'm stretching the
limits of my Python/Django abilities ;-)
Bruno got it right: what I want is a queryset of "model" with distinct
docid having the highest version number, sorted by revisiondate.
If have the following result of my
found_e
Hi guys,
I've been trying your suggestions but I'm afraid I'm stretching the
limits of my Python/Django abilities ;-)
Bruno got it right: what I want is a queryset of "model" with distinct
docid having the highest version number, sorted by revisiondate.
If have the following result of my
found_e
Hi guys,
I've been trying your suggestions but I'm afraid I'm stretching the
limits of my Python/Django abilities ;-)
Bruno got it right: what I want is a queryset of "model" with distinct
docid having the highest version number, sorted by revisiondate.
If have the following result of my
found_e
On 11 juil, 15:57, Michel30 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a basic search function that uses Q objects.
> After profiling it I found that the actual (mysql) database query
> finishes in fractions of seconds but the iterating after this can take
> up to 50 seconds per 10.000 results.
>
> I have been t
You seem to be hauling the same data from one side to the other, and I can't
see why.
Try:
MyModel.objects.values_list('id', flat=True)
You can use that to build a dictionary if you add a second field, or using
list comprehensions which I believe are faster than for loops,
dict(MyModel.objects.
I didn't try this approach yet, I'll give it a go and let you know my
mileage.
Thanks
On Jul 11, 4:06 pm, "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]"
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
>
>
>
> cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 11,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
> cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Michel30 wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Michel30 wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a basic search function that uses Q objects.
>> After profiling it I found that the actual (mysql) da
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Michel30 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a basic search function that uses Q objects.
> After profiling it I found that the actual (mysql) database query
> finishes in fractions of seconds but the iterating after this can take
> up to 50 seconds per 10.000 results.
>
Hi all,
I have a basic search function that uses Q objects.
After profiling it I found that the actual (mysql) database query
finishes in fractions of seconds but the iterating after this can take
up to 50 seconds per 10.000 results.
I have been trying to speed it up but I have had not much resul
14 matches
Mail list logo
