Now that my appetite is whetted by the cris-py fresh Object-Relational
Managers, I keep collecting and comparing them. So far I've found that
ruby's ActiveRecord is separable from RoR, and I found SQLobject.org, a
totally pythonic ORM (but no cigar... i.e., web). So it begs the
question -- what
braver wrote:
> Now that my appetite is whetted by the cris-py fresh Object-Relational
> Managers, I keep collecting and comparing them. So far I've found that
> ruby's ActiveRecord is separable from RoR, and I found SQLobject.org, a
> totally pythonic ORM (but no cigar... i.e., web). So it beg
I am not sure what you are saying here. Since SQLObject is under the
LGPL, your application can be under anything you want it to be. There
is no ambiguity.
Robert
Robert Hicks wrote:
I am not sure what you are saying here. Since SQLObject is under the
LGPL, your application can be under anything you want it to be. There
is no ambiguity.
Right... the only exception is that if you make changes to SQLObject
itself. The cool thing
about the LGPL is that
4 matches
Mail list logo