Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC & Lists - Minimal Change Set

2014-06-28 Thread Hector Santos
On 6/26/2014 9:13 PM, Chris Meidinger wrote: So two questions to the group: 1: Regardless of whether it has simply always been that way, could list operators forego modifying message bodies by adding footers? But will operators forgo adding footers for this as a standard practice? You can'

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Charter discussion being marked as spam

2014-06-28 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 04:16:10PM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote: > That said, yes, the ruleset for IETF mailing lists probably needs > tweaking, given the unusual nature of our content, with respect to > spam/anti-spam work. There's no need to run SpamAssassin on the IETF lists: simply configure Mail

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Draft DMARC working group charter

2014-06-28 Thread Hector Santos
On 6/27/2014 3:26 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: There's a proto-wg called dbound thinking about this topic. Marc Blanchet and I are trying to write up a problem statement before the Toronto cutoff, so we can at least try and see if there is any agreement on what problem we're trying to solve. That's

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DKIM Forwarding History (Provenance) Proposal

2014-06-28 Thread Hector Santos
On 6/28/2014 9:41 AM, Wei Chuang wrote: Note this isn't a full proposal as we would like the concept to be considered first. If this discussion is successful, we would like to also discuss a related improvement to SPF and DMARC, as well as the binary encoding change. At the conclusion we can ha