On Jul 1, 2014, at 9:00 AM, Dave Crocker dcroc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/20/2014 12:38 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
Here is some draft text to consider for a DMARC working group charter:
G'day,
I've looked over the small amount of mail posted about the draft charter
and do not see any
I am in favor of it, as written, as well.
-- Terry
From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 11:20 AM
To: Douglas Otis; Dave Crocker
Cc: Pete Resnick; dmarc@ietf.org; Barry Leiba
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Draft DMARC working group charter
I
In favor as written.
Brandon
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Terry Zink tz...@exchange.microsoft.com
wrote:
I am in favor of it, as written, as well.
-- Terry
*From:* dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Mike Jones
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 1, 2014 11:20 AM
*To:*
As a couple people have observed it's a complicated charter, but then
it's a complicated situation... I think this does the trick. +1.
That said, one small point to consider:
The task of defining a
standard mechanism for identifying organizational domain is out of scope
for this working
Dave Crocker writes:
Otherwise, I think the major question now is whether there is general
consensus on submitting this draft charter text to the IESG?
consensus += (1 if tpa_labels_and_similar__may_be_discussed else 0)
I have no opinion on the value of tpa-labels as a device to extend
Steven M Jones writes:
That said, one small point to consider:
The task of defining a standard mechanism for identifying
organizational domain is out of scope for this working
group. However the working group can consider extending the base
DMARC specification to accommodate such
