[dmarc-ietf] Cataloging MLM manipulations of messages

2014-09-22 Thread Steve Jones
Somebody suggested that we should catalog common manipulations that MLMs perform on the messages they handle. I took a first pass but it would surely benefit from wider review and input. I've put what I have so far on the DMARC WG wiki, as that seemed like a more convenient way to maintain

Re: [dmarc-ietf] yet more From rewriting,

2014-09-22 Thread Carl S. Gutekunst
On 09/22/2014 02:15 PM, John Levine wrote: mail readers. The existing use of X-Original-From is an existence proof of [perceived] utility, despite the absence of widespread (any?) MUA display of this data. Who uses X-Original-From ? This is a real question, I'm not aware of anyone who does.

Re: [dmarc-ietf] yet more From rewriting,

2014-09-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, September 22, 2014 21:15:30 John Levine wrote: mail readers. The existing use of X-Original-From is an existence proof of [perceived] utility, despite the absence of widespread (any?) MUA display of this data. Who uses X-Original-From ? This is a real question, I'm not aware of

Re: [dmarc-ietf] yet more From rewriting,

2014-09-22 Thread Josh Aberant
Who uses X-Original-From ? This is a real question, I'm not aware of anyone who does. At Twitter we use the X-Original-From to route our security tickets with users within our ticketing system Salesforce. Users can open and reply to tickets by emailing what is a Google Groups alias. Google

Re: [dmarc-ietf] yet more From rewriting,

2014-09-22 Thread Steven M Jones
On 09/22/2014 03:17 PM, Josh Aberant wrote: Who uses X-Original-From ? This is a real question, I'm not aware of anyone who does. At Twitter we use the X-Original-From to route our security tickets with users within our ticketing system Salesforce. Users can open and reply to tickets by