On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Tim Draegen t...@eudaemon.net wrote:
Hi Murray Elizabeth, thanks for wrestling this through the process. The
Working Group can now adopt this as input.
/goes off to figure out which buttons need to be pushed
=- Tim
I have to resubmit it as
Dear DMARC WG,
Now that RFC7489 has been published, there remains several
unresolved problems this WG is charted to resolve, primarily--
1. Addressing the issues with indirect mail flows
These are reviewed by
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dmarc-interoperability-00
Based upon the almost complete lack of interest of
bulk email providers at promoting a solution, it seems the path
forward is to define a new non-aligned header field able to retain the
author role information, otherwise the From is likely overwritten as
the only practical means of ensuring
FYI:
-- Forwarded message --
From: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org
Date: Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:04 PM
Subject: RFC 7489 on Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
Conformance (DMARC)
To: ietf-annou...@ietf.org, rfc-d...@rfc-editor.org
Cc: drafts-update-...@iana.org,
Hi Murray Elizabeth, thanks for wrestling this through the process. The
Working Group can now adopt this as input.
/goes off to figure out which buttons need to be pushed
=- Tim
On Mar 18, 2015, at 4:08 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy superu...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI:
-- Forwarded
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it wrote:
Right, which is why things like semi-colon don't need to be
percent-encoded; they're already special characters in the context of a
URL.
So are comma and exclamation. What puzzles me is that DMARC spec treats
them
