On 5/18/2015 10:58 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
>> The first question is: what are the 'types' of changes that have been
>> or might be proposed?
>
> Please define 'changes'. Do you mean: changes which solve the 'p=reject'
> problem for mail that is sent via an intermediary? Or just 'any' changes
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Terry Zink
wrote:
> Thanks, this is useful.
>
> What would the Authentication-Results header look like? Presumably 3
> results for DKIM (dkim=fail, dkim=pass, dkim=pass)? And what about DMARC?
> Show one result or two? Or maybe something like dmarc=conditionalpa
Thanks, this is useful.
What would the Authentication-Results header look like? Presumably 3 results
for DKIM (dkim=fail, dkim=pass, dkim=pass)? And what about DMARC? Show one
result or two? Or maybe something like dmarc=conditionalpass?
-- Terry
From: Murra
On 5/18/15 6:18 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Ideally on receipt by a list subscriber, the message would have the
> following DKIM signatures:
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=authordomain.example; s=selector; ...
> DKIM-Signature: v=2; d=authordomain.example; s=selector; !cd=mlm.example;
> l=0; ...
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Terry Zink
wrote:
> > I've implemented it now in libopendkim as a compile-time experimental
> feature,
> > and it took me about four hours including testing. I just have to add
> it to the plugin
> > that uses the library, and it'll be available for others to pl
> I've implemented it now in libopendkim as a compile-time experimental feature,
> and it took me about four hours including testing. I just have to add it to
> the plugin
> that uses the library, and it'll be available for others to play with.
Can you give an example of what the stamped headers
On 5/17/15 7:38 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Scott Kitterman writes:
>> On May 17, 2015 2:48:58 PM AST, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
>> wrote:
>>> Scott Kitterman writes:
>>>
Performing prosepective DMARC validation on receipt to
determine if mail would be subject to p=reject
processing o
On 05/15/2015 10:28 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
G'day.
In looking for ways to make a DMARC-style function succeed when the
message transits an intermediary, the current approach has mostly been
proposing one or another wholesale solution. This creates a complex
space for discussion and tends toward
