Minor nit noted below, otherwise in favor of the change from three to four
work areas.
--Kurt Andersen
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 2:59 PM The IESG wrote:
> The Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc) WG
> in the Applications and Real-Time Area of the IETF is undergoing
The Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc) WG
in the Applications and Real-Time Area of the IETF is undergoing
rechartering. The IESG has not made any determination yet. The following
draft charter was submitted, and is provided for informational purposes only.
Please
I actually agree with this: I think the better answer is to go back to
"obsoletes" and to have this document include the details of what was
put in the registries before. But the working group decided to do it
the other way, and there's been criticism in the past of ADs (and, so,
by extension, cha
> I _think_ this section 4 is about MTA-MTA authentication, right? For example,
> s/mime or other e2e signature enhancements would not be in scope, would they?
> How about new user-to-MUA authentication methods?
It's unfortunate that we've settle on the term "email authentication"
to refer to what
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 8:04 AM Kurt Andersen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 6:16 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>> Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-21: No Objection
>>
>> ---
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 6:16 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-21: No Objection
>
> --
> COMMENT:
> -
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-21: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Hi Kurt,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Kurt Andersen wrote:
> No objections to making the changes suggested by Adam. Will update
> pending AD direction.Please apply these changes to your copy, but wait before
> posting a
new version.
Best Regards,
Alexey
>
> --Kurt
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-04: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to htt
No objections to making the changes suggested by Adam. Will update pending
AD direction.
--Kurt
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:12 PM Adam Roach wrote:
>
> >> Received: from [10.10.10.131] (w-x-y-z.dsl.static.isp.com [w.x.y.z])
>
>
> Oh, I missed this one -- the domain ISP.com is registered and in ac
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-dmarc-01-02: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
The document, along
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting
& Conformance WG of the IETF.
Title : DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication,
Reporting, and Conformance) Extens
Hi Alissa,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, at 9:03 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-dmarc-01-00: Block
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free
I applied these changes. Thank you, Barry!
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, at 8:44 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> > The Phase I description is still included: "Draft description of
> > interoperability issues for indirect mail..." Isn't that rfc7960?
>
> Yeh, we did this too quickly, I'm afraid. We should mak
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:03 AM Alvaro Retana
wrote:
> Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-04: No Objection
>
> --
> COMMENT:
> ---
15 matches
Mail list logo
