Re: [dmarc-ietf] DNS library queries for DKIM and DMARC records?

2019-04-13 Thread John R Levine
As I understand it, your design depends on putting NXDOMAIN signals in the additional section to show that there aren't any boundaries between the names it returns. How do you plan to do that? John, I don't understand your note. In draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00, it says this: Another

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DNS library queries for DKIM and DMARC records?

2019-04-13 Thread Dave Crocker
On 4/13/2019 8:20 PM, John Levine wrote: In article you write: On 4/10/2019 8:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: print(response.additional) [] Turns out that's what I was especially hoping to see. As I understand it, your design depends on putting NXDOMAIN signals in the additional section to s

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DNS library queries for DKIM and DMARC records?

2019-04-13 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >On 4/10/2019 8:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > print(response.additional) >> [] >Turns out that's what I was especially hoping to see. As I understand it, your design depends on putting NXDOMAIN signals in the additional section to show that there aren't any boundaries

[dmarc-ietf] DMARC Coverage

2019-04-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
A couple of days ago I sent a single message to a reasonably large mailing list (spf-help, email oriented - so likely not representative, but it's a data point). Since I am a list owner, I know how many subscribers there are and from my DMARC feedback, I know how many times that single message

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [taugh.com-standards] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-03

2019-04-13 Thread Alissa Cooper
Tim, thanks for your review. John, thanks for your response. I can see how the section references could be a little confusing, but given the context of the surrounding text, I think leaving them as-is is ok. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Mar 11, 2019, at 8:31 PM, John R. Levine