On 5/23/19 3:52 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <5c2fc1da-ae7c-2efe-fda3-47855d61a...@bluepopcorn.net> you write:
>> There are domains that would like to receive reports, but whose usage of
>> mail doesn't make it useful to express a policy. Conversely, there are
>> domains that want to
In article <20190523225213.c214620147b...@ary.qy>,
John Levine wrote:
>In article <5c2fc1da-ae7c-2efe-fda3-47855d61a...@bluepopcorn.net> you write:
>>There are domains that would like to receive reports, but whose usage of
>>mail doesn't make it useful to express a policy. Conversely, there are
In article <5c2fc1da-ae7c-2efe-fda3-47855d61a...@bluepopcorn.net> you write:
>There are domains that would like to receive reports, but whose usage of
>mail doesn't make it useful to express a policy. Conversely, there are
>domains that want to express a policy but aren't interested in reports.
In response to Seth Blank's call for issues of 9 May 2019:
DMARC contains what are really two distinct mechanisms, a reporting
mechanism and a policy mechanism. The policy mechanism is largely a
request to the verifier about what to do in the event that a message is
received that does not comply
