Hello Douglas,
RFC 7372 describes these status codes. To my knowledge these are not used.
SPF helps on DMARC with MTAs, which cannot include DKIM signature
under circumstances (e.g in bounces). In all othercases SPF does not
provide added value to DKIM.
If you want errors about failed DK
Hello Grant,
it is a misconfiguration, but it still creates a mail loop for the site, that
is not misconfigured.
To what I can say the emails are accepted at SMTP time and then bounced.
I not asking to modify DMARC, but to recommend sending message-specific,
individual failure reports FROM: <
On 5/25/19 11:09 PM, Dilyan Palauzov wrote:
Emails to postmas...@modernwebsite.pl are answered with “Undelivered
Mail Returned to Sender”. The answers do not align to the DMARC policy
reject, so a new message-specific failure repot is sent.
Are the reports that you are sending being accepted
Hello John,
in case of modernwebsite.pl:
DNS TXT _dmarc.modernwebsite.pl is "v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;
rua=mailto:postmas...@modernwebsite.pl;
ruf=mailto:postmas...@modernwebsite.pl; aspf=s;adkim=s;"
Emails to postmas...@modernwebsite.pl are answered with “Undelivered
Mail Returned to
In article <1ee3bd2ebd204746a0d0641e186ca...@bayviewphysicians.com> you write:
> PROPOSAL
>
> When a recipient detects an SPF or DKIM problem, it can provide immediate
>feedback to the sender with message status codes.
No. If people want status reports, they'll ask for them.
On the other hand
In article <20190525183556.horde.zvg1bnsybvs_enkzpkjl...@webmail.aegee.org> you
write:
>Consider this scenario: an email from a domain, with DMARC policy
>“p=reject; ruf=postmaster@domain” fails validation. A
>message-specific report is sent to postmaster@domain. The report is
>bounced (or
On Sat, 25 May 2019, Dave Crocker wrote:
2. Along similar lines, I get confused when I hear that x% of {some set
of domains} has "deployed DMARC". What does that mean? Have they
Ultimately, you are asking marketing questions, not technical ones.
Right. It's easy enough to imagine soemone han
On 5/24/2019 10:35 AM, Jim Fenton wrote:
I hope this isn't devolving into a "we can't make any changes, because
it might break something" argument.
We are quite a long ways from that. In fact we are in the "please make
a case for their being a serious problem that needs fixing" argument,
com
The genius of DMARC, as compared to DKIM and SPF alone, is the feedback
component. Unfortunately, sender authentication remains challenged by
these issues:
Limited deployment of DMARC feedback between senders and receivers.
Significant levels of SPF and DKIM validation e
Hello,
is there already any recommendation from IETF to send DMARC
message-specific failure individual (non-aggregate) reports with
FROM:<> (or NOTIFY=NEVER)?
Consider this scenario: an email from a domain, with DMARC policy
“p=reject; ruf=postmaster@domain” fails validation. A
message
10 matches
Mail list logo
