The spec appears to be unclear on how subdomains are to be reported - ie
most but not all implementations have performed this as intended, in the
same XML as the top level domain (when the subdomain does not have its
own DMARC TXT record)
Cisco interpreted the current definition to mean that
Hello,
what is the purpose of the aggregate reports (rua)?
Regards
Дилян
On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 12:06 -0700, Elizabeth Zwicky wrote:
> I believe they MUST contain any aligned DKIM signature regardless of validity
> and SHOULD contain an entry for each domain, selector, result triple.
>
>
The problem with that language is that
o The identifier evaluated by DKIM and the DKIM result, if any
is genuinely unclear. Often there are multiple identifiers. Does this mean I
can pick any one of them? (That does not actually provide sufficient
interoperability.) If there’s a specific
The problem with that language is that
> o The identifier evaluated by DKIM and the DKIM result, if any
is genuinely unclear. Often there are multiple identifiers. Does this mean I
can pick any one of them? (That does not actually provide sufficient
interoperability.) If there’s a specific
I believe they MUST contain any aligned DKIM signature regardless of validity
and SHOULD contain an entry for each domain, selector, result triple.
RFC 7489 says:
The report SHOULD include the following data:
o The DMARC policy discovered and applied, if any
o The selected
I believe they MUST contain any aligned DKIM signature regardless of validity
and SHOULD contain an entry for each domain, selector, result triple.
Elizabeth
> On Jun 21, 2019, at 11:46 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
> In article <7cd366d2-ab8d-cce8-67ff-59b79183c...@tomki.com> you write:
>>
In article <7cd366d2-ab8d-cce8-67ff-59b79183c...@tomki.com> you write:
>As mentioned by Elizabeth recently: (Elizabeth please chime in if this
>doesn't capture your meaning)
>
>the spec does not define *which* DKIM signature should be reported in
>the DMARC RUA created by a receiver. The
As mentioned by Elizabeth recently: (Elizabeth please chime in if this
doesn't capture your meaning)
the spec does not define *which* DKIM signature should be reported in
the DMARC RUA created by a receiver. The proposed resolution to this is
that if the receiver does not provide the
