On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:07 PM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:45 PM Steve Atkins
> wrote:
>
>> > It's interesting that the industry has decided to interpret "p=reject;
>> pct=0" the way we intended "p=quarantine; pct=100".
>>
>> It's semi-explicitly defined that way in t
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:45 PM Steve Atkins
wrote:
> > It's interesting that the industry has decided to interpret "p=reject;
> pct=0" the way we intended "p=quarantine; pct=100".
>
> It's semi-explicitly defined that way in the RFC, isn't it?
>
If so, we should fix it because (a) I don't think
> On Jul 24, 2019, at 9:07 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> OK, I see what you're getting at..
>
> It's interesting that the industry has decided to interpret "p=reject; pct=0"
> the way we intended "p=quarantine; pct=100".
It's semi-explicitly defined that way in the RFC, isn't it?
Cheer
OK, I see what you're getting at.
It's interesting that the industry has decided to interpret "p=reject;
pct=0" the way we intended "p=quarantine; pct=100".
As for your proposal:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:52 PM Дилян Палаузов
wrote:
> And then, for p=none or any equivalent form of it, there i
Hello,
(I repeat what was said here, just in case)
As it was pointed out, p=quarantine; pct=0; is the same as p=none; and
p=reject; ptc=0; is the same as p=quarantine;
pct=100, therefore p=quarantine; pct=0 is not the same as p=reject; pct=0
currently, per
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7489#
Hello Murray,
Yes, rewriting depends on policy. Look at From: headers for this mailing
list (dmarc@ietf.org), you can see it only munges From address for
domain with strict DMARC policy (if RFC5322.From domain publishes
"quarantine" or "reject" policy). This is very common behavior, it can
also b
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:25 PM Vladimir Dubrovin wrote:
> Nope, I mean 2 different things.
>
> 1. Why quarantine is useful (with pct=0).
>
> For example this mailing list (dmarc@ietf.org) performs From rewrite (aka
> From munging), e.g. dubro...@corp.mail.ru is replaced with
> dubrovin=40corp.m
