On 8/5/20 9:36 AM, Jesse Thompson wrote:
> On 8/4/20 11:52 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> On 2020-08-04 6:10 p.m., Dotzero wrote:
>>> There is another solution. Move users to a separate domain from the domain
> Long ago we put users on our org domain as a way to unify users (in a very
> decentral
On 8/9/2020 9:54 AM, Tõnu Tammer wrote:
"Message
transit from author to recipient is through relays that typically make
no substantive change to the message content and thus preserve the DKIM
signature." If this is not the case, the relay is actually violating
DKIM standard.
However, a mailing
Hi!
I keep reading the discussion and I am surprised how people express
views that current DMARC standard does not work. I am surprised that
technical people here express this view.
DMARC relies on SPF and DKIM. The latter is particularly important for
the mailing lists to ensure that DMARC works
Hello,
Quick correction: As DMARC requires only either DKIM or SPF which I had
confused, this removes the need for the proposal point 1). Thanks for the
off-list help received.
This seems to be mostly an SPF issue, but still remains when
- SPF used used alone without DMARC (not sure if relevant
Hello,
I have been lurking here around for a while and we have been working at M3AAWG
for some time as well.
Today’s DMARC is breaking more and more email as it gets more widely and often
overly strictly deployed.
I feel the major issue with DMARC is email forwarding in it’s many forms, in
ad
