On 8/5/20 9:36 AM, Jesse Thompson wrote: > On 8/4/20 11:52 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> On 2020-08-04 6:10 p.m., Dotzero wrote: >>> There is another solution. Move users to a separate domain from the domain > Long ago we put users on our org domain as a way to unify users (in a very > decentralized institution) under a single domain identity, and that branding > decision is not going to be undone, politically. Any project to move users > from one domain identity to another is a huge lift; it takes a lot of time, > effort, and never actually completes due to stragglers with very legitimate > reasons to not give up sending from their old address. > > I think that end-users would rather see their list mail be rewritten than be > told to change their identity. I know that some people on this list think > that the domain in the from header isn't commonly visible anymore, but the > domain is extremely important to users' sense of identity.
>>> your transactional mails are sent from. You can also put users on a >>> separate subdomain. You really don't want to move users; they would need to notify all of their correspondents. Instead, leave the users where they are and move the transactional mail to a different domain (or to a subdomain) and put the restrictive policy there. -Jim _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
