Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #7: ABNF for dmarc-record is slightly wrong

2020-10-13 Thread Seth Blank
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:12 AM Hector Santos wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > Not direct to "slightly wrong" question but related to the ABNF > nonetheless. Maybe a need new Ticket? > Yes, please create a new ticket. > > We need a consideration for extended tags in ABNF. The 3.1.3 text >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #7: ABNF for dmarc-record is slightly wrong

2020-10-13 Thread Hector Santos
Hi Alexey, Not direct to "slightly wrong" question but related to the ABNF nonetheless. Maybe a need new Ticket? We need a consideration for extended tags in ABNF. The 3.1.3 text supports extensions. 3.1.3. Alignment and Extension Technologies If in the future DMARC is extended to

[dmarc-ietf] Ticket #7: ABNF for dmarc-record is slightly wrong

2020-10-13 Thread Alexey Melnikov
Dear DMARC WG participants, I would like your feedback on resolving the following ABNF issue: In Section 6.4 "dmarc-record" is defined as: dmarc-record= dmarc-version dmarc-sep [dmarc-request] [dmarc-sep dmarc-srequest]