On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:02 PM Barry Leiba wrote:
> I agree that the abstract is unclear. This makes no sense to me:
>
>domain names represent either nodes in the tree below
>which registrations occur, or nodes where registrations have
>occurred; it does not permit a domain name to
On 2/21/21 08:49, Chudow, Eric B CIV NSA DSAW (USA) wrote:
> I think it's getting better, but I wouldn't call them Internet Naming
> Authorities. Should we just call them higher-level entities?
There are proper names for these actors - there's no need to be even
more vague ...
> Also, while
I think it's getting better, but I wouldn't call them Internet Naming
Authorities. Should we just call them higher-level entities? Also, while the
biggest help that PSD DMARC would make is for non-existent organizational
domains, it can also help with other domains that haven't expressed a
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting
& Conformance WG of the IETF.
Title : DMARC Aggregate Reporting
Author : Alex Brotman
Count| Bytes | Who
++---
3 (16.7%) | 69293 (31.0%) | Ken O'Driscoll
2 (11.1%) | 38298 (17.1%) | Douglas Foster
2 (11.1%) | 30251 (13.5%) | Brotman, Alex
2 (11.1%) | 11388 ( 5.1%) | Alessandro Vesely
2 (11.1%) | 7975 ( 3.6%) |
