Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #47 (Removal of "pct" tag) - With Interim Notes

2021-06-04 Thread Tim Wicinski
+1 With Mr Levine's line of thinking. I also agree with keeping pct= tag. tim On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 7:16 PM Dotzero wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 6:17 PM John Levine wrote: > >> It appears that Alessandro Vesely said: >> >On Thu 03/Jun/2021 05:45:33 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Extensions in Aggregate Reporting - Feedback Requested

2021-06-04 Thread Dotzero
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:48 AM Brotman, Alex wrote: > Hello folks, > > During our interim call last week the topic of extensions within the DMARC > aggregate report came up. There was a discussion about how to best > introduce these, but also how they might be best used. I noted three cases >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Extensions in Aggregate Reporting - Feedback Requested

2021-06-04 Thread Trent Adams
I agree with Alessandro's suggestions, and really like the flexibility of self-labeled elements so they can be located where appropriate rather than forcing all extensions into a single bucket. My $0.02, Trent On 6/4/21, 3:27 AM, "dmarc on behalf of Alessandro Vesely" wrote: On Thu

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Extensions in Aggregate Reporting - Feedback Requested

2021-06-04 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Thu 03/Jun/2021 14:47:21 +0200 Brotman, Alex wrote: During our interim call last week the topic of extensions within the DMARC aggregate report came up. There was a discussion about how to best introduce these, but also how they might be best used. I noted three cases that I could see