I need some clarification.
Threat risk
---
You confirmed that the PSL has many potential uses, which confirmed my
suspicions. But your conclusions are different. I have been working from
the assumption that "PSL=TRUE" is equivalent to "DENY=(feature1, feature2,
feature3, etc). I d
It appears that Tobias Herkula said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>As an entity you want to be on the PSL to declare an organizational boundary,
>and usage is now for Cookies, Certificates, Domain Reputation and most likely
>a longer list of
>more obscure individual use cases. So most of the time a DNS-RR on a
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:54 AM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be helpful to understand why people want to climb into the
> publicsuffix.org list.My guess: An ISP, such as "ISP.TLD" allows
> customers to create websites under their parent. They need
As an entity you want to be on the PSL to declare an organizational boundary,
and usage is now for Cookies, Certificates, Domain Reputation and most likely a
longer list of more obscure individual use cases. So most of the time a DNS-RR
on a DNS label that states “I’m a PSL” is the use-case that
It would be helpful to understand why people want to climb into the
publicsuffix.org list.My guess: An ISP, such as "ISP.TLD" allows
customers to create websites under their parent. They need to be able to
indicate that website JohnSmith.ISP.TLD is independent of website
IvanWatson.ISP.TLD,
On Thu 04/Nov/2021 04:09:37 +0100 Douglas Foster wrote:
Ale asks:
Hm... but PSDs don't seem to gain any extras by letting receivers know they're
a PSD, do they?
I think they do. They get the benefits of name protection which DMARC
previously afforded only to organizational domains and su
