Re: [dmarc-ietf] moving past pad=y?

2022-06-30 Thread Douglas Foster
I think the formal term for "DNS Segment" is an A-label. US.COM is a single label between the PSO Domain ("com") and the client domains ("client1.us.com") There are a lot of important questions derived from Ale's topic, which originally started because he observed that registries like "us.com"

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Final, I hope, tweaks to the tree walk

2022-06-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
On June 30, 2022 7:12:42 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >On Wed 29/Jun/2022 19:17:05 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >>> Yes, the example is contrived, but since there are no rules limiting >>> delegation to third parties, we cannot be sure how subdomains are going to >>> evolve. >> >>

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Final, I hope, tweaks to the tree walk

2022-06-30 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Wed 29/Jun/2022 19:17:05 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: Yes, the example is contrived, but since there are no rules limiting delegation to third parties, we cannot be sure how subdomains are going to evolve. My view is that we are in a case that is sufficiently obscure that the answer to

Re: [dmarc-ietf] moving past pad=y?

2022-06-30 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 7:18 AM Douglas Foster < dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Based on our psl information, a private registry will be at DNS segment 3 > or 4. If the PSO registration is at DNS segment 2, the private registry > could be either one or two segments thick. > What