Count| Bytes | Who
++---
19 ( 100%) | 234825 ( 100%) | Total
4 (21.1%) | 19795 ( 8.4%) | John Levine
3 (15.8%) | 62266 (26.5%) | Brotman, Alex
2 (10.5%) | 54677 (23.3%) | Trent Adams
2 (10.5%) | 23130 ( 9.8%) | Mark Alley
2 (10.5%)
It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
>I don't think it's needed. My understanding is that failure reports aren't
>typically used as an aid to troubleshooting DMARC failures. The aggregate
>reports are sufficient for that. The failure reports have other information
>that's useful for other
What I'm hearing so far is: "Cancel the DMARC session."
I will do that on Wednesday if I don't hear a reason not to. Please
speak up quickly if you think cancelling is not the right thing.
Barry
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 8:51 PM Barry Leiba wrote:
>
> We do have a session scheduled for IETF 116.
