It appears that Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> said: >I don't think it's needed. My understanding is that failure reports aren't >typically used as an aid to troubleshooting DMARC failures. The aggregate >reports are sufficient for that. The failure reports have other information >that's useful for other forensic purposes for which no one will care about the >version of DMARC that led to the failure.
It also occurs to me that anyone who sends failure reports also sends aggregate reports, so if you care, you have a way to find out. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
