OLIVIER HUREAU wrote on 2023-07-24 11:20:
> c) There is a pattern of similar looking reports, which omit the
element in the altogether and always report
fail in the policy result. I suspect a product, which makes
it a bit too easy to enable DMARC validation without also enabling DKIM
verifica
Hector Santos writes:
> o Concerning p=reject:
>
>- Our focus on p=reject should be expanded to include p=quarantine
> as they're both challenging. We should perhaps categorize these under
> 'Restrictive Policies'.
I will repeat the point I made in the mic in IETF: I think DMARC
should real
On Mon 31/Jul/2023 19:03:27 + Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:59 AM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
[...] the idea of demanding all lists the world over start munging From
fields (or whatever mutation we claim is now mandatory) will not happen in
short order no matter ho
