Thank to both of you.
@Murray: Re-reading the sentences with your input, that would make sense
@Todd: Indeed, DMARCbis is pretty clear about it.
I look forward for DMARCbis to be published, as that will lead to one less
edge-case to worry about.
Regards,
Damien
On Jan 11, 2024, at 13:46, Mu
In addition to what Todd offered:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:51 AM Damien Alexandre wrote:
> The RFC first states:
>
> "Messages bearing a single RFC5322.From field containing multiple
> addresses (and, thus, multiple domain names to be evaluated) are
> typically rejected because the sorts of ma
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:51 AM Damien Alexandre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A question I have reading the RFC7489 and more precisely the part «6.6.1
> Extract Author Domain».
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7489#section-6.6.1
>
>
> The RFC first states:
>
> "Messages bearing a single RFC5322
Hello,
A question I have reading the RFC7489 and more precisely the part «6.6.1
Extract Author Domain».
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7489#section-6.6.1
The RFC first states:
"Messages bearing a single RFC5322.From field containing multiple
addresses (and, thus, multiple domain name
