On Mon 15/Jan/2024 20:49:35 +0100 John Levine wrote:
It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
I don't think that's sensible at all. It's not the place of a signing filter
to modify the message.
A signing filter, as part of an MSA _has to_ modify the message in order to
enhance the possibili
The purpose of DMARC is to demonstrate that the purported author (From) is
either the actual author or the authorized agent of the actual author.
Because of practical difficulties, this is an indirect process: DMARC
PASS demonstrates that a specific sending domain is authorized to speak on
behal
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:03 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Mon 15/Jan/2024 20:49:35 +0100 John Levine wrote:
> > It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
> >>I don't think that's sensible at all. It's not the place of a signing
> filter to modify the message.
>
> A signing filter, as part of a
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:24 AM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> As I recall, with milter in particular, the MTA will add a missing Date
> field, which the filter never actually sees and thus cannot sign. The
> filter only sees the message exactly as it was presented to the MTA. As a
> result, if
