Re: [dmarc-ietf] are mailing lists worth saving?

2020-12-10 Thread Rich Kulawiec
Yes, they are. I've been editing a document that lays out some of the strong arguments in their favor. It's still a draft (and may always be because I keep revising it), but here's a version of it: -- Mailing lists, which were sometimes called "reflectors" in their early days,

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Charter discussion being marked as spam

2014-06-28 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 04:16:10PM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote: That said, yes, the ruleset for IETF mailing lists probably needs tweaking, given the unusual nature of our content, with respect to spam/anti-spam work. There's no need to run SpamAssassin on the IETF lists: simply configure

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.

2014-06-10 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 08:46:00AM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: NNTP was designed 30 years ago. We should consider moving on. The modern protocol world is JSON/REST Let's not be so quick to dismiss NNTP: it's a more elegant weapon from a more civilized age. ;) It has long since proven