On Mon 14/Dec/2020 16:57:53 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrote:
From: John R Levine
The goal was to clarify the language, without (to the best of our ability)
changing the schema. I'd welcome a other attempts at clarifications (if you
believe mine introduces structural XML changes).
So it'd say
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -Original Message-
> From: John R Levine
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 4:34 PM
> To: Brotman, Alex ; dmarc@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dmarc-ietf] Clarification of Subdomain
>
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020, Brotman, Alex wrote:
That's a somewhat incompatible change, so I'd want to be sure we agree that
it's a real problem that's worth changing the report format. I suppose if we do
we should encourage report consumers to be prepared for old and new formats.
The goal was to
> -Original Message-
> From: John Levine
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 2:39 PM
> To: dmarc@ietf.org
> Cc: Brotman, Alex
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dmarc-ietf] Clarification of Subdomain Reporting
>
> In article
> 11.prod.outlook.com> you write:
>
