Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Report Statistics

2024-03-28 Thread Matthäus Wander
Seth Blank wrote on 2024-03-28 02:09: What is your point / the information you find relevant here to WGLC of the bis project? To me, the data confirms that the schema matches with how the reports are being sent in practice. This includes in part the lesser known fields, which are all being

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Report Statistics

2024-03-27 Thread Seth Blank
What is your point / the information you find relevant here to WGLC of the bis project? We do many times this volume in a single day and are happy to share top line stats. Seth -mobile On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 18:08 Matthäus Wander wrote: > Here is an evaluation of 84k aggregate reports in

[dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Report Statistics

2024-03-27 Thread Matthäus Wander
Here is an evaluation of 84k aggregate reports in the timespan of 2020-2024. 481 reporting organizations derived from 896 distinct strings ---+--- 44 use Organization Names ("Example") with min=1, median=1.0, mean=1.11, max=3 distinct names 344 use Organizational Domains