On March 29, 2023 1:00:29 AM UTC, "Murray S. Kucherawy"
wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 5:30 AM Trent Adams 40proofpoint@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Regardless of the outcome of that analysis, though, it does seem
>> reasonable to ask the reporter to include a tag indicating the method the
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 5:30 AM Trent Adams wrote:
> Regardless of the outcome of that analysis, though, it does seem
> reasonable to ask the reporter to include a tag indicating the method they
> employed to discover the policy. They will know which method they use,
> it's reasonable to reques
all the reasons
previously discussed, it may not be wise to key off of a version, but we could
use some indicator of discovery.
- Trent
From: dmarc on behalf of Scott Kitterman
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 9:50 AM
To: "dmarc@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action:
dr
On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 1:09:34 PM EDT Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Tue 28/Mar/2023 17:49:57 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I can live with it [the ] since it's optional (I
> > don't think it'll get a lot of traction), but I do think it's misplaced.
> > I
> > think it's metadata, not message
Negative on software specifics.
A general security principle is to not release configuration specifics
that could be used against you to exploit a product-specific vulnerability.
Doug
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023, 1:09 PM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Tue 28/Mar/2023 17:49:57 +0200 Scott Kitterman wr
On Tue 28/Mar/2023 17:49:57 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
I can live with it [the ] since it's optional (I
don't think it'll get a lot of traction), but I do think it's misplaced. I
think it's metadata, not message data as it's about how the receiver processed
the message, not about anything that
o elaborate a bit more?
>
> --
> Alex Brotman
> Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
> Comcast
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: dmarc On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
> > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 3:21 PM
> > To: dmarc@ietf.org
> >
it more?
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -Original Message-
> From: dmarc On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 3:21 PM
> To: dmarc@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-
On Monday, March 27, 2023 12:29:03 PM EDT internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message
> Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF.
>
>Titl
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message
Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF.
Title : DMARC Aggregate Reporting
Author : Alex Brotman
Filen
10 matches
Mail list logo
