On Jun 10, 2014, at 2:47 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> This is interesting, however it seems to me that DMARC should be more aware
> of it if used.
>
> Why? This is a way of satisfying the alignment requirement on the DKIM side.
>
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Vlatko Salaj
wrote:
>
> seems murray and dave pushed it out at this very moment
> to divert attention and discussion from a more fully fledged
> 3rd party DMARC alignment support calls.
>
>
We're all brainstorming about solutions here. There's nothing wrong with
p
> I don't see how DKIM-Delegate is going to address all
> the key protocol faults that has always plagued the DKIM project.
it's not. it's another half-baked DKIM addon, in a sea of many,
introduced to resolve ML support for DMARC. barely.
seems murray and dave pushed it out at this very moment
