On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 1:44 AM Дилян Палаузов
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> to the idea to amend the existing definition of p=:
>
> quarantine: The Domain Owner wishes to have email that fails the
> DMARC mechanism check be treated by Mail Receivers as
> suspicious. Depending on the
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 4:44 AM Дилян Палаузов
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> to the idea to amend the existing definition of p=:
>
> quarantine: The Domain Owner wishes to have email that fails the
> DMARC mechanism check be treated by Mail Receivers as
> suspicious. Depending on the
Hello,
to the idea to amend the existing definition of p=:
quarantine: The Domain Owner wishes to have email that fails the
DMARC mechanism check be treated by Mail Receivers as
suspicious. Depending on the capabilities of the Mail
Receiver, this can mean "place int
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:02 AM Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> Policy is an indication of sender preference, not a directive the receiver
> must follow. I think the definition is fine. If the sender prefers
> failing messages be quarantined, then they should use that policy. They
> won't get what th
Policy is an indication of sender preference, not a directive the receiver must
follow. I think the definition is fine. If the sender prefers failing
messages be quarantined, then they should use that policy. They won't get what
they want in all cases and that's fine.
Scott K
On August 3,
Hello John,
I am really saying, that some addresses, like majordomo@ , which send answer to
each received and accepted message, have
no capability to perform a form of “quarantine”.
It does not matter, whether this is an edge case. Once it is clarified how to
act in this case, the same procedu
In article <97b7d4320e77f9be84703677eba79686ec769f75.ca...@aegee.org> you write:
>Hello John,
>
>the "... reject at SMTP level" is at least for messages, directed to an
>address, which does not support the
>concept of
>quarantining.
>
>Please propose what shall a site do, receiving a message, subj
Hello John,
the "... reject at SMTP level" is at least for messages, directed to an
address, which does not support the concept of
quarantining.
Please propose what shall a site do, receiving a message, subject to
quarantining, for an address, that does not support
quarantining.
Regards
Dily
In article you write:
>Current wording for p=quarantine
> quarantine: The Domain Owner wishes to have email that fails the
> DMARC mechanism check be treated by Mail Receivers as
> suspicious. Depending on the capabilities of the Mail
> Receiver, this can mean "place
Current wording for p=quarantine
quarantine: The Domain Owner wishes to have email that fails the
DMARC mechanism check be treated by Mail Receivers as
suspicious. Depending on the capabilities of the Mail
Receiver, this can mean "place into spam folder", "scrutin
10 matches
Mail list logo
