On Wed 30/Dec/2020 22:17:47 +0100 John R Levine wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, John Levine wrote:
In article <0408ae98-e1c1-71fe-fdd4-8bc7a7c15...@tana.it> you write:
We would like to close this ticket by Dec 18, two weeks from now, so please get
on it.
The ticket originated from John's comment,
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, John Levine wrote:
In article <0408ae98-e1c1-71fe-fdd4-8bc7a7c15...@tana.it> you write:
We would like to close this ticket by Dec 18, two weeks from now, so please get
on it.
The ticket originated from John's comment, in May 2019:
Apropos recent discussions, we could
On Wed 09/Dec/2020 18:22:04 +0100 Dave Crocker wrote:
On 12/9/2020 7:23 AM, John R Levine wrote:
No. This is not a problem. There is nothing to fix. Please close this ticket.
+1
Fair enough. Ticket closed.
Best
Ale
--
___
On 12/9/2020 7:23 AM, John R Levine wrote:
No. This is not a problem. There is nothing to fix. Please close
this ticket.
+1
d/
--
Dave Crocker
dcroc...@gmail.com
408.329.0791
Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crock...@redcross.org
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
It seems better than the other three bullets, so I'd prepend it. Does the WG
agree?
No. This is not a problem. There is nothing to fix. Please close this
ticket.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
On Wed 09/Dec/2020 01:04:46 +0100 John Levine wrote:
In article <62b7d80e-2c39-4d02-0b5a-bd6ede7d5...@tana.it> you write:
When dmarc authentication method fails on a message, an MTA may decide to send
a failure report. If the message is itself a failure report, however, no
failure report
In article <62b7d80e-2c39-4d02-0b5a-bd6ede7d5...@tana.it> you write:
>When dmarc authentication method fails on a message, an MTA may decide to send
>a failure report. If the message is itself a failure report, however, no
>failure report should be sent. The question is, how does the MTA
On Mon 07/Dec/2020 20:51:12 +0100 John Levine wrote:
In article ,
Alessandro Vesely wrote:
4. Some explicit loop prevention specification may be added. For example:
4.1. send reports from a subdomain having a DMARC record without ruf=, or
4.2. never send failure reports about failed
In article <0408ae98-e1c1-71fe-fdd4-8bc7a7c15...@tana.it> you write:
>We would like to close this ticket by Dec 18, two weeks from now, so please
>get
>on it.
>
>The ticket originated from John's comment, in May 2019:
>
> Apropos recent discussions, we could recommend that failure reports be
On Mon 07/Dec/2020 08:15:57 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:10 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
We would like to close this ticket by Dec 18, two weeks from now, so
please get
on it.
The ticket originated from John's comment, in May 2019:
Apropos recent
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:10 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> We would like to close this ticket by Dec 18, two weeks from now, so
> please get
> on it.
>
> The ticket originated from John's comment, in May 2019:
>
> Apropos recent discussions, we could recommend that failure reports be
>
In article <0408ae98-e1c1-71fe-fdd4-8bc7a7c15...@tana.it> you write:
>We would like to close this ticket by Dec 18, two weeks from now, so please
>get
>on it.
>
>The ticket originated from John's comment, in May 2019:
>
> Apropos recent discussions, we could recommend that failure reports be
We would like to close this ticket by Dec 18, two weeks from now, so please get
on it.
The ticket originated from John's comment, in May 2019:
Apropos recent discussions, we could recommend that failure reports be
rate limited per recipient both to break loops and to deter indirect
13 matches
Mail list logo
