> On Jan 25, 2022, at 10:35 AM, John R Levine wrote:
>
> Do we have any stats on how often real mail depends on sibling alignment? If
> nobody actually uses it, the spec would be simpler if we could take it out.
Stats are tricky, but here are some senders using sibling alignment like
From
On Tue 25/Jan/2022 20:39:11 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:26 AM John R Levine wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
will get the same result. It also occurs to me that in the absence of
a PSL-like thing, the idea of an organizational domain is no
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:26 AM John R Levine wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> >> will get the same result. It also occurs to me that in the absence of
> >> a PSL-like thing, the idea of an organizational domain is no longer
> >> useful.
> >
> > Aren't we basically
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
will get the same result. It also occurs to me that in the absence of
a PSL-like thing, the idea of an organizational domain is no longer
useful.
Aren't we basically trying to identify the same thing, just in a different
(and more robust) way?
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 9:40 AM John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
> >My impression is that the group is generally okay with PSD=y. I prefer
> it over your suggestion. My strongest preference is that we pick
> something, stick with it, and move on.
>
> I think I see
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022, Dotzero wrote:
If they are cousin domains, walk up the tree from each until you find a
policy record. If you find the same policy
record and it's not a PSD and it allows relaxed alignment, they're in
relaxed alignment. If you find different
records, or only one record, or
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:40 PM John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
> >My impression is that the group is generally okay with PSD=y. I prefer
> it over your suggestion. My strongest preference is that we pick
> something, stick with it, and move on.
>
> I think I see
On January 25, 2022 5:40:09 PM UTC, John Levine wrote:
>It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
>>My impression is that the group is generally okay with PSD=y. I prefer it
>>over your suggestion. My strongest preference is that we pick something,
>>stick with it, and move on.
>
>I think I
It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
>My impression is that the group is generally okay with PSD=y. I prefer it
>over your suggestion. My strongest preference is that we pick something,
>stick with it, and move on.
I think I see where Ale's confusion is coming from. If we switch to a
tree
