ones
Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 2:49 PM
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Version in aggregate report
On 3/9/23 11:45, Tomki Camp wrote:
I think that's a good idea. Mike Jones from Fortra (ne Agari) also expressed
concern during M3AAWG 57 about problems for data analysis to be
On 3/9/23 11:45, Tomki Camp wrote:
I think that's a good idea. Mike Jones from Fortra (ne Agari) also
expressed concern during M3AAWG 57 about problems for data analysis to
be able to determine how a specific receiver's result was achieved,
with the discovery methodology doubling.
An XML
0" maxOccurs="1"/>
>
>
>
> The excepted values being the enumerated discovery mechanisms (e.g.
> something like "hop", "treewalk").
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> - Trent
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *dmarc
It appears that Trent Adams said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
>Alex -
>
>I think that the difference comes down to an inference made by the report
>analyst (and assuming enough data to make an
>informed guess) vs. the report generator expressly stating the mechanism they
>used.
>
>IMO, it makes sense to
*From: *"Brotman, Alex"
> *Date: *Thursday, March 9, 2023 at 11:37 AM
> *To: *Trent Adams , "dmarc@ietf.org" <
> dmarc@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *RE: [dmarc-ietf] Version in aggregate report
>
>
>
> Trent, I’m not entirely opposed to the idea, though I w
Ei_n_ok=187s
From: "Brotman, Alex"
Date: Thursday, March 9, 2023 at 11:37 AM
To: Trent Adams , "dmarc@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [dmarc-ietf] Version in aggregate report
Trent, I’m not entirely opposed to the idea, though I wonder if it’s necessary.
It seems like if
in the report to point at, we
can create a field.
Thoughts from others?
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
From: Trent Adams
Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 11:44 AM
To: Brotman, Alex ; dmarc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Version in aggregate report
Alex -
erhaps something like:
The excepted values being the enumerated discovery mechanisms (e.g. something
like "hop", "treewalk").
Thoughts?
- Trent
From: dmarc on behalf of "Brotman, Alex"
Date: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 at 9:25 AM
To: "dmarc@ie
While reviewing something in the aggregate doc, I came across this bit in the
XML specification. Unless I've missed something, we're not incrementing the
version in the DMARC DNS record.
So, if we're not changing that DNS record, obviously this "version" string has
less meaning. The
