Section 3.1.2.3 is just wrong. EAI specifically does not allow for
downgrading of messages in transit from UTF-8 headers to ASCII
headers. ...
Yes not in transit, but the downgrade is likely to happen at the source
be it the human or the MUA (I have not seen an implementation of such
yet
- Original Message -
From: ned+dm...@mrochek.com
To: Tim Draegen t...@eudaemon.net
Cc: dmarc dmarc@ietf.org
Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 5:58:10 PM
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] interoperability draft for review
Hi all,
Frank, Eliot, and myself have finished up a first cut
- Original Message -
From: John Levine jo...@taugh.com
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: t...@eudaemon.net
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 6:31:11 PM
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] interoperability draft for review
In addition to other comments:
Section 3.1.2.3 is just wrong. EAI
Latest diff is at
https://github.com/dmarc-ietf/id/commit/d7b1a401f3c171c27df926bd6a0c5a2ba06eec9b
May be the xml diff (at then end) is best to read. Github is not very nice with
RFC formatting...
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
- Original Message -
From: Murray S. Kucherawy superu...@gmail.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@peachymango.org
Cc: Tim Draegen t...@eudaemon.net, dmarc dmarc@ietf.org,
ned+dm...@mrochek.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:43:52 AM
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] interoperability draft
In addition to other comments:
Section 3.1.2.3 is just wrong. EAI specifically does not allow for
downgrading of messages in transit from UTF-8 headers to ASCII
headers. The only place the header downgrade is allowed is when a
non-EAI MUA picks up mail via POP or IMAP, but that would be long
Hi all,
Frank, Eliot, and myself have finished up a first cut at the WG’s 1st real
deliverable:
• Document describing interoperability issues with DMARC and indirect
mail flows and possible methods for addressing them.
Please review at your convenience and submit comments,
Hi all,
Frank, Eliot, and myself have finished up a first cut at the WG’s 1st real
deliverable:
• Document describing interoperability issues with DMARC and indirect
mail flows and possible methods for addressing them.
Please review at your convenience and submit comments, feedback,
