Re: [dmarc-ietf] not enhanced status codes Some Proposed Language for a New pct Tag Defintion

2021-07-31 Thread Douglas Foster
2.6.0 really is a mystery to me. The domain under study uses p=reject and is getting 100% authenticated in the RUA reports, so it does not fit John's theory. I always get 2.6.0 from outlook.com servers and a few other destinations. So perhaps it is just their version of "OK so far, but I may blo

Re: [dmarc-ietf] not enhanced status codes Some Proposed Language for a New pct Tag Defintion

2021-07-31 Thread John Levine
It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy said: >Indeed; I would like to understand what 2.6.0 is meant to convey. As I >read the IANA registry entries, "2" means success but "6" means there was a >media type error. I think it's supposed to mean "I accepted your message but I wouldn't have if I were