Re: [dmarc-discuss] rddmarc & comcast reports

>I noticed last week rddmarc fail to read aggregated reports from Comcast. >They send an unusual Content-Type: application-x-gzip; The most recent Comcast reports I have are from September, and they have the same wrong content type. It should be Content-Type: application/gzip; ... whatever

Re: [dmarc-discuss] rddmarc & comcast reports

Yes, the slash is mandatory. From RFC 2045 5.1: content := "Content-Type" ":" type "/" subtype *(";" parameter) ; Matching of media type and subtype ; is ALWAYS case-insensitive. - Roland Roland Turner | Labs Director Singapore | M:

Re: [dmarc-discuss] rddmarc & comcast reports

That has to be a syntax error. On 11/10/15, 12:02 AM, "dmarc-discuss on behalf of A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss" wrote: > >Hello, > >I noticed last week rddmarc fail to read aggregated reports from Comcast. >They send an