On Fri 14/Oct/2016 08:37:08 +0200 Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss wrote:
On 2016-10-13 20:06, Matt Simerson via dmarc-discuss wrote:
The problem in this thread is an issue with some DMARC report senders
failing to parse the DMARC URIs properly, if that DMARC URI includes
size limits.
Right
On 2016-10-13 20:06, Matt Simerson via dmarc-discuss wrote:
This thread has been hijacked by the lack of reading comprehension.
Nobody (in this thread) has complained of DMARC reports being too
large.
Right.
The problem in this thread is an issue with some DMARC report senders
failing to
On 2016-10-14 00:26, Brandon Long wrote:
Actually, from the code, I'm surprised we handle a single address with
!
correctly. I'll file a bug.
Thanks, Brandon!
Juri
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
