On Mon 21/May/2018 18:24:13 +0200 Ken O'Driscoll via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 09:29 -0600, Pete Holzmann via dmarc-discuss wrote:
>> QUESTIONS:
>> 1) Is anyone working to solve these issues?
>> 2) Has there been consideration of a forwarding token that could validate
>> all such
In article you write:
>Until then, a simple forwarding —refraining to append any disclaimer or virus
>scanning notice to the body of the message— would not break DKIM signatures and
>hence leave DMARC authenticity intact. That is exactly the problem that DKIM
>was designed to solve, to overcome t
(adding to the comments already posted...)
On 5/21/2018 8:29 AM, Pete Holzmann via dmarc-discuss wrote:
* From 'R's perspective, they simply want those emails to show up in
their "other inbox"
Most of the anti-spam technical work has focused on transport-related
mechanisms, without much atten