Re: [dmarc-discuss] Know anyone working on ARC at Microsoft ?

2020-01-02 Thread Seth Blank via dmarc-discuss
Yes, Kurt and I have been working closely with the team implementing this. Currently, AFAIK Microsoft's ARC implementation is internal only and is not yet expected to interoperate with external systems. There are conversations in progress about how to apply this in the future; there will probably

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Know anyone working on ARC at Microsoft ?

2020-01-02 Thread Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
On 01/02/2020 09:53, Seth Blank via dmarc-discuss wrote: Currently, AFAIK Microsoft's ARC implementation is internal only and is not yet expected to interoperate with external systems. I'm happy to provide them with a New Year's reminder that people are watching. :-) But yes, it's also wo

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Know anyone working on ARC at Microsoft ?

2020-01-02 Thread John Levine via dmarc-discuss
In article <0746ea03-c242-1020-7df8-f087f58a0...@crash.com> you write: >But yes, it's also worth noting that the item posted to the "Microsoft >365 Roadmap" at the end of October only discussed the use of ARC when >receiving messages for mailboxes hosted by Microsoft. It didn't address >any use

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Know anyone working on ARC at Microsoft ?

2020-01-02 Thread Seth Blank via dmarc-discuss
The Microsoft ARC headers that I've seen have all validated; I wonder if something new is broken. Can you share what you're seeing? On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 1:39 PM John Levine via dmarc-discuss < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > In article <0746ea03-c242-1020-7df8-f087f58a0...@crash.com> you wri

Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF Macros

2020-01-02 Thread Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Hi Ivan, It's been a while (several years) since I tried using them, but a surprising number of receivers honoured them (meaning that some internal structure of receivers was made visible); those that didn't appeared to disregard the SPF result. - Roland