Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism

2021-07-06 Thread Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
On Tue 06/Jul/2021 02:55:23 +0200 Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss wrote: On 22/5/21 7:41 am, Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss wrote: At least at one point we definitely saw enough senders requiring too many lookups that we cared more about trying to find a positive evaluation than downside from

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism

2021-07-06 Thread John Levine via dmarc-discuss
It appears that Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss said: >> I'd suggest that a resolution to this might be to expand the finite limit >> (I've >> also had trouble with the 10 lookup limit, even for a small organisation), > >Why do organizations need more than 10 lookups? Do they have a choice

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Correct counting of DNS lookups for SPF record containing MX mechanism

2021-07-06 Thread Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
On 7/7/21 2:57 am, John Levine via dmarc-discuss wrote: It appears that Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss said: >> I'd suggest that a resolution to this might be to expand the finite limit (I've >> also had trouble with the 10 lookup limit, even for a small organisation), > >Why do organiza