Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC forensic reporting options

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 9:08 AM, John R Levine wrote: > Maybe it is time to rethink this, or open a more official dialogue. I >> understand folks don't want to send reports. I understand the privacy >> issue. However, without these reports, or at least *some* information >>

Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC forensic reporting options

Maybe it is time to rethink this, or open a more official dialogue. I understand folks don't want to send reports. I understand the privacy issue. However, without these reports, or at least *some* information sent regarding the unaligned emails, we are at an impasse to migrating to a 'reject'.

[dmarc-discuss] DMARC forensic reporting options

As a result of mail receivers not sending forensic reports, the amount of time to migrate to a reject policy can increase considerably. It would be a nice option within the DMARC RFC to specify a new switch indicating the desire to receive header-only forensic reports. The expectation being that