[dmarc-discuss] Use of in DMARC aggregate reports

2021-12-02 Thread Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
Hi list members, We see many aggregate reports where is a subdomain which does not publish a DMARC record. The DMARC record is on the organisation domain. The specification (RFC 7489 appendix C) says this should be the domain at which the DMARC record was found, not the RFC5322 From domain:

[dmarc-discuss] Yahoo DMARC reports

2018-10-04 Thread Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
Hi there, Yahoo (OAuth) is sending DMARC reports with a space after the “end” timestamp: 1538524800 1538611199 This breaks strict parsers which expect an integer, following the schema In RFC 7489: It has been like

[dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports from Trustwave SEG

2018-04-13 Thread Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
Hi, Is anyone from Trustwave on this list? Their SEG software don’t know how to spell "Content-Type”. It’s spelled without dash: =c5c709ca-bc35-4c5e-aca0-da12cbc9280f ContentType: application/gzip; name=“receiver.co.uk!sender.com!1523433708!1523522202!4344.xml.gz"

[dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports from TrustWave SEG

2017-03-21 Thread Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
Is anyone from Trustwave SEG on this list? They should check the spelling of Content-Type in their DMARC reports: =6777a7f7-be29-40d4-ba25-6d03af8ce8d1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is a DMARC report generated by Trustwave SEG.

Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC and null path

2016-05-09 Thread Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
Hi Franck, You explained this before, but also then I didn’t quite understand. First you say there is the SPF check on HELO and on MAILFROM. That I know and understand. Then you say DMARC only uses the RFC5321.Mailfrom, but which includes falls back on RFC5321.Helo. But isn’t that the same

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Multiple SPF results in report

2016-04-04 Thread Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
Do you mean that in the XML you see 6 elements in one element? Or do you mean you see 6 different domains in the your reports? Maarten Oelering Postmastery > On 4 apr. 2016, at 09:05, Nick via dmarc-discuss > wrote: > > I received a DMARC report with multiple SPF

Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC configuration when using spam solution in Front of O365

2016-04-02 Thread Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss
If you can share the full email header of a test mail as it is received, that would help. For example from a Gmail account. Based on that it's easy to check SPF/DKIM validation, alignment, etc. You can also use a service like emailaudit.com to check all DMARC prerequisites. Maarten Postmastery